Archive for the ‘Podcasts’ Category

The Wonderful World of Video

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

daisy whitney
rick scarry

This week features the diverse Hollywood actor Rick Scarry, and popular online video analyst Daisy Whitney. Rick reflects on his appearances on shows such as Desperate Housewives, Weeds, Mad Men, and The Office, and shares information on his new movie which debuts next month. Daisy discusses the impact that collaboration is having within online video, and how she watches shows without a traditional cable TV service.

Topics covered in this episode:

- What it’s like to be a character actor in Hollywood.

- The movie “Flower Girl” debuts on November 14th.

- Breaking into the video production industry.

- How acting opportunities have increased over the years, but the new challenges that youth actors face.

- How Spidvid benefits individuals in today’s show business.

- Be part of quality projects that involve quality people.

- How new media has evolved from a techie space to a more mainstream industry.

- Studios are directly focused on their business models right now, but long-term are keeping their eyes on collaborative media models.

- How online video show producers are leveraging simple forms collaboration.

- How a 16 year old YouTube sensation is attracting massive viewer attention.

- Where long-form video production may be headed.

- Cord cutting your cable TV service to watch shows and videos exclusively online.

Full Text Transcript

Show Introduction: Hi, I’m Michael London and welcome to Spidcast the future of collaborative video production brought to you by Spidvid.com. On this episode, we’re visiting with Rick Scarry. You may not know the name, but you’ve seen the face hundreds of times. Rick is an actor, who’s appeared on Desperate Housewives, Weeds, That 70s Show and so many others. We’ll get his perspective from the actor’s point of view on the value of Spidvid.

And speaking of television, our second guest today hasn’t had cable or satellite for quite awhile now, but she is a fan of TV via the Internet. Daisy Whitney, the host of New Media Minute and This Week in Media, will share with her thoughts on the changing landscape of media production and delivery.

So let’s jump right in to this week’s Spidcast.

Michael: First up is character actor extraordinaire, Rick Scarry. Rick, it’s so good to talk with you and welcome to Spidcast.

Rick: Well, thank you, Michael. It’s good to be on here with you. I haven’t talked to you in a long time. We’ve actually known each other for far too long and I’m not going to say how long because people will think we’re ready for the retirement home.

Michael: You were right there and although we haven’t talked for a while, I have seen you plenty. In fact, a lot of our listeners have seen you not knowing that it’s you.

Rick: I think that’s actually the case is that people see me all the time. They don’t know me. I actually work a lot. I’m a character actor. It’s funny because when you’re that kind of actor, you’re always referred to as “that guy”, “oh, that guy” and people will run into you in a bank or in a supermarket or in an airport and they’ll look at you and kind of point and they usually say, “Did we go to high school together?” Because they don’t know why they know you.

Michael: And they do know because you’ve been in their living rooms in glorious HD. A time to brag a little bit, Rick, share with us some of your credits, if you will please.

Rick: Well, I’ve been very fortunate the last few years. I’ve worked all the top television shows in the last couple of years alone. Desperate Housewives, The Closer, Mad Men, which is a big hit right now, The Office, and a recurring role with Weeds for a whole season, Heroes, Bones, I could go on and on and on, but I’m not going to.

Michael: My goodness. It’s like reading a top ten list of television.

Rick: It’s been going very, very well. I will give a plug. I do have a Hallmark TV movie coming up in November. One of those tear-jerking love story Hallmark movies on the Hallmark Channel called Flower Girl. The title is not one of my favorites, but when you see it, it’s very understandable of what it’s about. It’s a terrific movie and it’s a kind of thing that I do a lot of. Hopefully, it will be successful.

Michael: Flower Girl, very cool. Now, so folks can put a name to the face, who do you play?

Rick: I play the small town pastor at the local church, who gets involved in – all those Hallmark movies always take place in some fictional town with a name like Willow Grove or something out there in Midwest Land. I’m the town pastor who gets involved in people’s lives.

Michael: As in real life, right? So of all these parts that you played, do you have a favorite show you played on? Or a favorite cast that you’ve worked with?

Rick: Well some are quite enjoyable. I started working a lot. You’ll hear the stories about how horrible people were and so and so had a big ego. Actually, it’s only three or four times in my entire career where I ever run into actors who were incredibly unpleasant. Most parts, they’re wonderful.

The most recent show I was on, Bones – couldn’t ask for a nicer bunch of people in the world. Every single one of them was just absolutely terrific. That’s the case with everybody actually. I’ve loved Kyra Sedgwick, working the scene with her on The Closer. She was just one of the nicest people I’ve ever been around. The Office was just great fun. We laughed until I thought I was going to cry some days.

For the most part, I have a very easy and wonderful job and actually get paid for it. So it’s pretty cool.

Michael: Well, that’s good to hear. Now, Rick, you’ve taken a pretty traditional route to your career – acting classes, getting an agent and the like, right?

Rick: I started taking acting classes, boy, when I was practically a child in the ‘60s. I was very fortunate to study with some of the legendary ones including the legendary Stella Adler, who taught Marlon Brando and people like that and still take acting workshops to this day because it’s a craft. Like anything, you have to practice. Musicians have to practice. Actors have to practice. I did and it was very difficult. In those days, all you have were agents and casting directors in getting yourself known and getting yourself out there.

There was no way to expose your talent other than hopefully get into a play and maybe a casting director would come to see you and then you’d get a job. It worked and it evolved over a course of years. I’m old enough to where I had to go through that process. Now, I’m very fortunate. These days, I don’t really have to audition much anymore. You just go what’s called direct offers where they call you up and say, “We’d like you to do this.” You get to say yes or no. I can’t believe how difficult it must be for people getting started today.

A young actor today has so many elements involved. We never had Internet. We never had the ability to show people our videos of our work. We never had any of those opportunities that exist today. I think that’s probably the most important differences today’s actor has a myriad of ways to put themselves out into the marketplace and try to figure out which of those is the best way to do it.

Michael: And so that naturally brings us to Spidvid. So tell us, Rick, from the actor’s point of view, what value there’ll be to an up and coming actor at Spidvid.com?

Rick: Well, the ability to be listed among other professionals to expose yourself to people – what I love about this is it’s not just people in Los Angeles where I live, you could be exposed to people anywhere in the world who’s looking for talent of any kind when it comes to production. I think that’s such a valuable thing today. There are lots of websites and lots of things to do this sort of thing. But I think if you can place yourself in a situation whether reputable, well thought type of website, the producers are going to realize that they might be dealing with somebody who really knows what they’re doing.

Michael: And all you had to present was a carefully retouched headshot, right?

Rick: That’s all I had to do, had all the wrinkles taken away. Today, you’ve got just so many elements involved. As one of my agents said to me, “Show business is 10% show, 90% business.” And that’s exactly what it is.

Michael: Show business, right. It’s used to be all about the show. Now, you mentioned that there are various places like Guru or Mandy or even Craigslist where an aspiring actor can seek out opportunities. Often the producers offering to pay little or no money or just offer you meals or a copy of the project or something like that. Talk to the young actor about working for free?

Rick: Well, it all depends on the project. It could be incredibly valuable or it could be an utter waste of time and an eventual embarrassment in many cases if it’s something horrible that will never go away. I worked for free a lot in my younger days because you wanted the experience of being out there to actually be on a set, to interact with other actors, to see what it’s actually like. Because at first, you’re not sure how all the elements come together because nobody ever teaches you that part of it. They teach you how to portray another person then they don’t teach you to stay on here, speak this and do that.

When you see a new actor on the set for the first time, they look like a deer in the headlights. They don’t know what the words mean. Something as simple as hitting your mark, you know, they go, “What does that mean?” Well, that’s where you’re supposed to stop when you’re walking. Those things I actually heard taught to people. It seems strange but they’re really not. And you have to kind of learn as you do it. There’s no better way to learn doing that stuff than a lot these incredibly low budget projects which may be no-pay or just a per diem with meals and stuff.

I think they can be valuable. I think you have to really look in the project and see if it’s something you want to be a part of. I don’t ever encourage anybody just to take anything. Always look at it and see what it is.

Michael: That’s great advice, Rick. And I’ll tell you something, whatever that magic is, whatever that combination is, you have found it because you are so much fun to watch.

Rick: Well, thank you.

Michael: Tell folks where they can learn more about you?

Rick: www.rickscarry.com

Michael: Very cool. And one more time, tell us about the Hallmark Channel movie coming up.

Rick: Well, I believe the new date is November 14th and of course, they run about a thousand times over there. It’s called Flower Girl. Stars actually, it was such a thrill for me, one of the great old characters from Happy Days, Marion Ross, who played Mrs. Cunningham. She’s this wonderful old lady in town who’s part of my congregation at the church. Also stars a wonderful young actress named Marla Sokoloff, who was on The Practice for many, many years. She’s just a delight. It was really a wonderful experience. I think it’s going to be a fun, enjoyable movie. It’s a love story kind of thing and I hope people like it.

Michael: We will look for you on that and hopefully many, many projects in the future.

Rick: I hope you see me so much that you can’t take it anymore. Let’s put it that way.

Michael: Rick Scarry, wonderful, wonderful actor, wonderful man.

Up next is Daisy Whitney with her thoughts on TV, film, Internet and stuff.

Intermission: You know how challenging it is to produce quality videos without the help from others who have the skills and talent you need. Well Spidvid let’s you find the individuals you need for your video production project so you can create the Internet’s next big viral hit. Visit Spidvid.com. Click the sign-up link and reserve your spot within our collaborative video community today.

Michael: Joining us now is the host of New Media Minute and This Week in Media, Daisy Whitney. Daisy, welcome to Spidcast and tell us how you become interested and involved in New Media?

Daisy: Well, in terms of covering New Media – I’ve been a reporter for about 12-15 years and around 2000 and 2001, I was covering technology for TelevisionWeek magazine back when it was very unglamorous and un-sexy and with racks of servers and transcoding machines and traffic systems and TV stations, but covering that actually put in a good position when Disney and I (considered a deal) back in 2005 to turn TV shows on iTunes for the very first time. Then that brought me sort of very deeply into covering New Media. That was really a track back to that point and I’ve been (conquering) the online media revolution since then.

Michael: As you say, the online media revolution is upon us. Tell us your thoughts about traditional video producers and/or studios, and how they view individuals connecting worldwide.

Daisy: I don’t actually think that videos have a lot of concern yet about collaboration and some of the different efforts that we’re seeing. I think that they are so focused right on what’s happening with their businesses, how many challenges they face in their own business models, but I think probably in time, as we see more examples like the example that we saw with the Facebook Mass Animation project and how that did. I think if we see more examples like that and of what it can bring to the table, that’s when studios will put up and take notice. They’re a little focused on other things right now.

Michael: Exactly. I can see how they’d be looking after their immediate concerns. Now, you cover and see lots of independent individuals producing web video shows, do you feel that they’re gradually learning more about how leveraging collaborative production can benefit their overall content quality, especially longer term?

Daisy: I really think that this trend towards collaboration is something that we’re really going to see across a lot of different creative fields and media fields. It definitely is something that independent producers are doing, but are also being – I’ve seen a lot of efforts from big advertising agencies. In that case, it’s a little bit wild on the technology side. I mean, you think things like (wire drive) or different Adobe Connect tools so that they can share files.

Sometimes it’s even simple things like Google Docs. But I just think that generally, we’re seeing this triangle within the media business to be able to share information and parts of projects more freely. Even just on a very small basis, I write New Media Minute and I write the script for it in Google Docs with my husband because he’s my videographer. Yes, that’s very low tech, I know, but I just think those are the sort of examples where as you scale up an organization as you have a studio or an advertising agency or what have you, would I have much more elaborate files and content to share. They’re looking for these types of solutions. I think that the benefit is a better product.

The (Parkinson folks) at the History Channel, they’ve built some of their own internal productivity tools so that they can share files and promos that they’re building within the network much more easily. It actually allowed them to produce more promos for shows. The benefit is they can tailor their promos in to the actual time that it run so that they can have an edgier while running late in the evening. Maybe it’d be appropriate for family hour earlier in the day. That’s because of technology that enables all the different people who are in that department to work together and share what they’re working on.

Michael: Well, technology certainly has opened the door for many talents and individuals that we might not have seen prior to this. Talk to us a bit about Fred.

Daisy: Well, I think that Fred is definitely teaching a lot of people a lot of lessons because if you ask folks who are over 20 what they think about Fred, a lot of people scratch their heads. You really have to have young children to appreciate Fred. I have young kids and they just think he is fantastic. I think that traditional studios and network really need to pay attention to why he is popular, who he is speaking to and what it is that the YouTube generation actually wants. I think that we may see some efforts when we try to ape or imitate their programming. I just don’t know that something like that is going to translate back to TV. I don’t think we’re going to see real change and a real carry over for probably a few more years. The real key is to see that the generation, the younger folks are really enjoying this type of content on a regular basis where it becomes a norm for what they consume. We need to see them grow up a little bit more and then we’ll have stronger data and research to figure okay, is this a really a complete change over in the type or programming content that people want to see.

Michael: So Daisy, as the Fred kids become teens and young adults in the next five to ten years, do you believe that there’ll be long-form content like quality movies and shows produced by teams with members located all over the planet, thanks to the evolution of social platforms and collaboration tools?

Daisy: Well, I’m definitely fond of collaboration and these tools like Spidvid and things like that, but I still think that each project needs to be evaluated individually to see what is needed. Is this the type of project that will benefit from collaboration? Is this the type of thing that’s going to be better off led by an individual? I think for every creative endeavor, they all really need to be considered discreetly on their own to see what’s going to serve the end product.

I definitely think we’re going to see more experimentation. The challenges are just kind of keeping them a creative thread throughout making sure that a storyline make sense. I think you probably need one person at least that leads a project and I think in charge for that sort of collaboration to really work. It needs to be clear, I think back to the Facebook Mass Animation example and I think one of the reasons that that project is a short film, it’s going to be running before Planet51 in theatres, which I think it comes out in November. A terrific film.

One of the reasons it works is that the director behind it has such a strong creative vision of presence in general that he was able to just give guidelines and set the agenda. So I think that’s going to be a really good test about if you will for what we’ll start to see that’s successful. I think we’ll definitely see bigger projects that are produced on a collaborative basis.

Michael: Now speaking of that traditional delivery and consumption of media, you’ve been without a cable TV connection for a while now. Do you see more cord-cutting happening as more video shifts to the web and more viewers buy in to broadband TV?

Daisy: Well, I’d like to see more of it. I’d want people to join my cable-free army. I think there’s some conflicting evidence out there right now on terms of other people are shifting or cord-cutting. I think there are a lot of folks who are still really interested in trying Verizon Fios TV for instance. I don’t have that but I hear great things about it. It’s one of the services where I think a lot of people who have it don’t hate the cable company and they like a lot of the other benefits of it.

I think there’s still a lot of competition for multi-channel video operators, cable providers who are eager to do the fighting as hard as they can to keep customers and to win some of the newer customers. But I definitely think as online delivery becomes stronger as more things come online, I think that as there’s more evangelism, if you will, from people like me and other people about how you can live a completely cable-free lifestyle, you still get to see everything.

I think we’ll definitely see more of a shift. I’ve become a big fan of the Fox show Glee and it airs on television on Wednesday nights and I don’t have cable. I could get it over other broadcasts but I don’t want to watch the commercials. In my house, it feels like it’s on Thursday nights on Hulu. We just kind of have that in our minds and that’s when Glee is on, and I think once you start reeling it, it’s just a matter of kind of training yourself in those little things like you see the show maybe a day later than most other people do.

I still think from a mainstream standpoint, we’re definitely aways off. I’ll run into friends of mine at the grocery store and they’ll say things like “Oh, is that show on tonight? Well we better go watch it.” It’s foreign to me because the show is on when I want to watch it.

Michael: Yes, I agree on that. I want my media when I want it and where I want it. Now, speaking of where and when, Daisy, where can Spidcast listeners go to read, listen and watch what you are covering in online video?

Daisy: The best place to find me online is on my website, www.daisywhitney.com and my New Media Minute is carried there and there are also links out to the different content like This Week in Media. And I’m also keeping a largely regular blog. I blog about 2-3 days a week about the writing process and my paths to publication because my first novel which is for teenagers is coming out next fall from Little Browns and it’s called The Mockingbird. So I’ve been writing about that, you can find everything you need to know there.

Michael: Daisy, thank you so much for joining us today.

Daisy: Thank you, Michael.

Michael: My thanks to Daisy Whitney and Rick Scarry for joining us in this week’s Spidcast. Thank you for listening. You can join in on the conversation by visiting Spidcast.com. We welcome your thoughts, opinions and feedback. I’m Michael London, until next week.

Improving the Video Production Process

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

seth kenvin

This week features Seth Kenvin, who is the CEO of Market7. Seth talks about collaborative environments so individuals located all over the world can work on video production projects in real-time, improving the overall process.

Topics covered in this episode:

- Seth’s vision for the video collaboration space.

- How individuals can benefit using new social and collaborative platforms.

- How budgets for production projects can be managed in a more effective way.

- When it became evident to Seth that better technical tools were needed for producing quality video content.

- How collaborating and communicating in real-time with team members works.

- How video creatives are from Venus, and producers are from Mars.

- What the future challenges and opportunities are for video production.

- How Market7 impacts the business side of video production.

- How Market7’s collaborative tools improves video production for every team member involved.

Full Text Transcript

Show Introduction: Hi, I’m Michael London and welcome to Spidcast, the future of collaborative video production brought to you by Spidvid.com. On this episode, we’re visiting with Seth Kenvin, an Internet entrepreneur and CEO of Market7.com. Seth will discuss his vision of the future of collaborative productions and his part in that arena. Market7 is a superb tool for everybody – from producers to grips and it’s all about keeping it organized and keeping it profitable for everyone. So let’s jump right in to this week’s Spidcast.

Michael: Seth, thank you so much for joining us today.

Seth: Thank you for the opportunity.

Michael: Tell us if you would a little bit about Market7.

Seth: Market7 is a company that endeavors to provide environments for people to work together on making videos. So the different ways that we work together on content creation, coming with an idea, getting it scripted, storyboarded, moving on to post-production when there’s footage to look at, how do people review it and provide their feedback that got the editing process and ultimately approve of that content and throughout in addition to the content collaboration that has to happen, different aspects of project management for people to work better together whether that’s scheduling events, assigning tasks, sharing files and the like.

Michael: Man, there’s a lot going on with what you just said and you somewhere, somehow saw the need for Market7. What was that, let’s say, the a-ha moment for you when you realized that this was needed to be created?

Seth: I’ve been in high-tech marketing and a few years ago, the marketing activities in which I was participating expanded from what they had been. Things like developing websites and public relations and events, white papers to include video alongside those other activities. I was more frequently commissioned video production projects working with producers and finding that the utilization of software and technology to make communications clear and to make processes more efficient in video was lacking compared to a lot of those other sorts of projects.

If I could give one example, if we’re working together on a document, presentation, a paper, and we take the software into something like track changes mode, you or I can look at each other’s comments right within the context of the content on which we’re working so I can see that you have a comment or suggested that it is exactly where it would appear. In video and contrast, conventionally, what people do is they’ll look at the video in a player, that player doesn’t have a mechanism for feedback so they have to either scribble down their notes for later exchanges or maybe toggle between the player and email or compile their feedback. Once there’s feedback from multiple parties, there could be confusion as to who’s attending carries the day are people who are waiting to the right file or is everybody being good about indicating with the timelines.

So getting that capability to sort of very intuitively integrate ones feedback within the content itself was something that I’ve found lacking in video production projects. The more I explore it, the more I realized that there were a number of elements the whole way through from conceptualization to completion of video production that could stand to be done more clearly and more efficiently with the right software.

Michael: Let me clarify this in my mind. You’re saying that you have a video on your site and we’re working on it together. We’re discussing the added points and save the music cues and we can work on those elements and be communicating in real time as well?

Seth: That does happen. And actually, there’s an equal advantage if we work asynchronously. In terms of real time, if you and I are both looking at the video and you post a comment to a Web browser on your end, I will see and my client that comment dynamically appear while I’m making my edits. I can reply to it so we can essentially have a real time messaging session while we’re both watching the video together.

Similarly, if we are in completely different time zones or have completely different schedules, and need to coordinate our efforts without being able to be together, this can have correct for the kinds of issues that frequently arise through the ambiguity of how to think about video. If you want to make a comment about a particular portion of the screen and instead of having to describe “you know that part in the upper left where there’s some pixelation or something like that”, when you leave your comment, you can actually highlight that portion of the screen.

Your comment is going to specify where in the timeline to change to what’s in the video. So if your comment pertains from 0:01:14-0:01:19, you’d be able to demarcate that. So whether we’re working together simultaneously, under the gun and we’re trying to communicated as efficiently and expeditiously as possible, we can have a real time session with the same thing or for reasons we can’t coordinate being available at the same time, this actually makes up for some of the frequent ambiguity that exist when we’re working asynchronously.

Michael: Now, I got to tell you, Seth. I have worked video production for close to 20 years and I’m telling you that aside from sitting side by side in an editing suite with your client, this is just fantastic for the producer.

Now, you’ve often said that creatives are from Venus and folks who commission projects are from Mars. What exactly do you mean by that?

Seth: If I could actually go back to the episode in which the company started, one of the things I did that I sure think of there may be a company who are doing this better because I went to producers I’d hired and first thing I would do given the opportunity to talk about the potential for this new company is complain to them about “Why did you service me so poorly? Do you realize how we work in an enterprise the way we collaborate on projects, the way we deal with our bureaucracy and coordinate our communication and you’re just handing off a stack of DVDs or pointing us to an FTP site doesn’t suit our needs if you don’t provide the framework in which we can clearly communicate and reach consensus and provide you with organized feedback?”

And then as the conversation procedure, it got to be their turn to kind of complain to me about how I who was a poor correspondent to them in my role as a client. For example, one of the things I heard from producers we hired is the fact that we would show up for a shoot and essentially had done no preparation and made no allocation for effort or budget for pre-production.

So we would show up for a shoot and then at times would be half a dozen people there on crew, they didn’t know how they’re supposed to set up their gear to shoot because the thing hasn’t been storyboarded. There was somebody with a teleprompter while we were still hacking at the script. The person who was going to read the script that they were a company employee was hardly prepared with their lines and was inept to do multiple takes and this producer/director person was stressed out about the fact that they had a client who was not adequately prepared that right in the middle of the process, there was a shoot to do and I think that kind of illustration of where those of us kind (add) the organizational side, the corporation tend to fall down in our execution on video.

We’re used to sort of 80/20 rule in situations in which if a paper or a presentation is due tomorrow and it’s hardly started, not an ideal situation, but we can probably pull something out that’s at least going to be good if not very good by being kind of resolution enough about getting it done the right way. While if in video, there’s only so much you can do in the eleventh hour because whatever content you have is already there. There’s only so much you can salvage in editing.

And the client’s frequent lack of understanding of that imperative is one example. Like others include the fact that producers tend to be more creatively-oriented. Their clients are the people commissioned the video tend to be more sort of structured in their orientation maybe more bureaucratic versus more freelance in nature. Even down to the sort of “I’m a Mac” “I’m a PC” type of element where one party used to working with that they’ll be creating the suite software and that kind of interface within a Mac environment and the other is possible more like going to be spending most of their time computing in Microsoft Office on Windows.

So what we’re trying to do is allow those people to work together and whatever we develop from pre-production to post-production and project management throughout every single feature we push out, we’re constantly putting ourselves in the minds of the person who’s sporadically involved in video production, who’s more corporate in their orientation how are they going to experience it and how’s it going to feel most intuitive and powerful to them and likewise the person who’s constantly engaged in video production more creatively-oriented, how do we provide the right interface for them to feel equally at home and able to be productive.

Michael: Excellent points there because getting the suites and the creatives on the same page can be such a challenge. I’m glad you’re trying to bridge that. I really appreciate that piece of it. While we’re in the area of the suites or the (bean counters), how does Market7 impact the business end of video production?

Seth: Much of what we talked about has to do with the content collaboration of we’re involved in. Our modules included a creative brief of production brief in which people can layout what is the strategy and what might be some of the key tactical to getting this project done. We have a scripting module which can layout the actual content. That includes advantages like being able to assess how long that content is likely to run based on the length of the script. It also supports integration of visual elements like viral footage, storyboards, headshots of actors, etcetera.

We got our post-production player that supports integrated feedback and commenting in order to guide the editing process. Really throughout the process, those are more staged around content collaboration throughout the process, we enable functionality like task assignment, event scheduling, and one of the modules that we just released in the last couple of months actually pulls from those for resource management. A frequent issue – in video production, as we’ve talked to people is just given the creative nature of both the process and the people involved, there’s often an oversight over how much time went into this. Did it line up with projections? Did we make or lose money on this project?

So one of the things we do that endeavors to basically fold than in very conveniently is we take the information we have from tasks, we take the information we have from events and we compile a sheet of how much time each participant in the project spent.

For example, if a task is assigned to you within the project, when you check a box to indicate you’ve completed that task, there’s actually a processing how much time did you spend on that and two pushes of the keyboard, you can press 60 to indicate that you spent an hour on it and you’re done with that.

When someone schedules an event and scheduling events within our software flow right through the people’s personal calendaring, whether they used Gmail or Outlook or Entourage, whatever systems of email and counter-management that you use. There’s no double work here. When you want to schedule an event and invite people from your organization or involved in your effort, you can schedule it within Market7, push it through their personal calendars. We have some functionality already for checking people’s availability and we’re enhancing that as we speak.

Again, these resource measuring pieces will pull the information for which task you completed and how long it took you, what events you participated and how long they are scheduled for, allows you to add other items very easily like click a button and indicate, I spent 10 hours editing and 2 hours on the storeroom and then compile across all that how much total time did you spend in your project and with just two more fields, you can enter OK and the projected time for this person was so many hours and the hourly cost of this person is so much and then basically get a practically automated report of how much time and money did each participant in this project spend versus what was expected and for someone in the production, the responsibility get an understanding as the project is progressing. Is this again a profitable or unprofitable project for me? Is this a client that tends to work with me towards my time goals or not? Next time a project comes up with this client or maybe even time before it’s over, confront the fact of where we are in terms of real time, effort and implied finances by going to this project compared to what was anticipated.

Michael: Wow, the updates in continuing audits of production costs and expectations are very, very useful. And since we’re on that topic of finance, it’s no secret that the economy has been quite harsh for businesses over the past year. What has Market7’s experience been especially being such a relatively young company?

Seth: First of all, we’re a small company, so to a degree, we’re fortunate that our spending was already at a low level when the time got to a period where there was good reason to keep it at a lower level. Second of all, this is a really fascinating time to start a company. For myself, my prior startup experience was in a router company. A company that actually made gigantic telecommunications equipment so by necessity, a lot of funding was required to both engineer and to manufacturer of that equipment, in this case web-based software in 2009.

Due to those factors, a lot of things conventionally, one had to ascertain to put in to the software are not there anymore. We don’t need to run our own servers and systems and have an extensive systems administration staff. Also because it’s web-based software as a service, our requirements for supporting users are different that they might have been otherwise. All somebody needs is a browser. They don’t have to maintain the software on their premises. And for us, we can incrementally get a functionality which keeps us on target and also lessens the drama around any particular feature release.

In fact, we can get it even better by to a degree of relaxing. We talked to our users about how they’re using our software, currently comprehend where the wishes for enhances are and build towards that enhancement and iterate again. Get it in front of them and often within days or weeks, comprehend just how well does a suite what they’re looking to get out of it. So instead of overly accessing on our own side and frankly being inefficient by anticipating how people are going to use it, we can get it right into peoples hands, get that feedback in real time and go from a good to a great implementation within days or weeks instead of taking weeks and months to get a pretty good implementation out.

Michael: So the fact that changed rapidly for your clients certainly speaks well of Market7 and your commitment to customer satisfaction. That’s great.

Now, technology and behavior is constantly changing, so what are some of the challenges and opportunities did you see coming down the road for collaboration around video production?

Seth: Well, we at Market7 at the moment are very focused on the actual production stage from conceptualization to completion. There are important endeavors both before and after that that I believe can probably be that are addressed through some of the same approaches that we’re bringing to the production process. Once video is completed, how do people access it within an organization? How do they publish it out to the world and monitor its performance in the world? How do they utilize it internally if somebody has a meeting about a particular topic coming up with somebody? How do they find what content might we have within my organization about that topic? Who’s had experience with it and what did they thought?

Likewise, before the video is produced, generally, video is taken on by sort of like a transient team – a group of people that kind of form together and disband once the project’s done. Maybe people come back together in the future, but often in different combinations. I think likewise, a lot of these technologies that are very flexible and web-based and rapid can enable the identification of what’s the right team for this particular project. How do we convene those people – assure that they have the right availability and that with things are lined up for them to collaborate and build expediently that the best possible team of skills and abilities toward working together in advance of the project.

Michael: Seth, as a media producer, I love your philosophy. I love your product and I love your attitude as well. And you seem to have solved a lot of the problems that I’ve encountered as a producer. Thank you for joining us today.

Seth: Thank you.

Michael: And how do people get in touch with you?

Seth: Well, our website is a great place to connect with us. It’s www.Market7.com. We’re fairly active on Twitter which you can also get through to our website, but our Twitter handle is “marketseven”. We’re based in San Francisco. You can look up our address on our website and you’re free to visit us, and we’re reachable at anytime by phone as well 415-981-8000.

Michael: Again, Seth, thank you so much for joining us on Spidcast.

Seth: Thank you.

Michael: Seth Kenvin, CEO of Market7. I’m Michael London. Thank you so much for joining us today on Spidcast.